Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:21

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
‘I feel like I’ve been lied to’: When a measles outbreak hits home - The Spokesman-Review
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What are some mind-blowing facts that sound unreal but are actually true?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Consequuntur dolor explicabo ipsa autem vel eos et.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Humans Age Faster at 2 Specific Times in Their Life, Study Finds - ScienceAlert
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Oldest human DNA ever found tells the story of a lost branch on the human family tree - Earth.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Animi velit error sapiente nihil.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ford's CEO says China's EV progress is 'the most humbling thing' he's ever seen - Business Insider
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear: